Tag Archives: truth

Catholicism, Revolution, and Conformity

Posted on by
Reply

Catholicism, Revolution, and Conformity

 It has been suggested that Catholicism is stodgy, old-fashioned, constraining, and conformist. The truth is that none of these descriptions of Catholicism are true; rather Catholicism is consistently revolutionary, challenging the demands for conformity in every age. In his masterpiece, “Orthodoxy”, G.K. Chesterton succinctly noted, “People have fallen into the foolish habit of speaking of orthodoxy as something heavy, humdrum, and safe. There never has been anything so perilous or as exciting as orthodoxy.”

 The modern world trumpets freedom and self expression, yet it is in reality conformist in the extreme. Moderns must conform to concepts of the day, to the hip music, to whatever is in vogue, and, most importantly, to the glorification of self.  Modernity is a slave to the self; its freedom is not liberating, but rather is very confining. Its sole object is the self. It has made science and government (the state), the new gods, possessing answers to all questions. The modern emphasis on the self demands that man subjugates everything to that which enhances the self. Consequently, those objects that represent an inconvenience or threat to the self can be eliminated or severely restricted, such as unwanted unborn (or even born) children, the elderly, or other supposedly “non productive” people.

On the other hand, only Catholicism is the true revolutionary, challenging each generation in every society to view liberty as the limiting of the selfish, while focusing outward on others and on the Other. For this reason, Catholicism is viewed as a great peril by those that want to limit man’s vision to the narrow confines of self. Notwithstanding the personal failures of many within the Church, Catholicism remains the only true revolutionary. It alone defines the true objection of man’s efforts – God. It is not conformist or stagnate, but rather is challenging and alive, seeking man’s fulfillment through and with God.

Catholicism is hated and feared by many as the most radical system of beliefs, not only because its belief and total acceptance of God, but also because it is seen as a threat to self-centered individualism and the power of the state.

Suggested Reading:

“Orthodoxy” by G.K. Chesterton, published by Ignatius Press

 

The Real Presence

Posted on by
Reply

The Real Presence

It started as a little spark, so small, so insignificant, but continued to grow and spread. The little spark became a fire, which very rapidly turned into a wild, then cyclonic conflagration as it sucked more and more air into itself… Nature continued to change the air into food for the ragging inferno. Nature had changed one substance into another, a common occurrence in nature. Yet God the creator of nature is questioned when He changes bread and wine into His own Body and Blood.

What images can one use to describe the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist? How can such a mystery be explained? It is difficult to create any adequate images that may help a person understand that Jesus Christ is really present, body and blood, in the Eucharist after the priest consecrates the bread and wine at Mass. The best approach may just be to use the words of Jesus Himself when He issues His demand….yes it is a demand, to eat His body and drink His blood. Jesus is the guarantor of the reality of the actual presence of His body and blood in the Catholic Eucharist.

In his gospel, John thoroughly relates the command of Jesus to “eat my flesh and drink my blood.” Jesus began his discourse on what we now call the Eucharist shortly after He fed the multitudes with bread and fish. Thus Jesus had prepared his followers for His astonishing revelation that they must be prepared to eat His flesh and drink His blood. Indeed though it was a difficult command to understand and accept, yet it occurred only after Jesus had presided over many miracles; He was preparing His followers for some hard teachings. Many could not accept the direction to eat His flesh and drink His blood; it was too hard for them. When followers began to murmur against the idea of eating His flesh and drinking His blood, Jesus did not change or refine His message. Jesus did not indicate that he was speaking only symbolically, but rather He emphasized that He was truly commanding his disciples to eat of His flesh and drink His blood. Then as now, Jesus was willing to accept the loss of many of His followers, rather than water down the truth of the requirement to eat His body and drink His blood.

St. Thomas Aquinas clearly stated in his Summa Gentiles that “by the conversion of bread into the body of Christ the very body of Christ exists in this Sacrament of the Church and is eaten by the faithful.” In the Catholic Catechism it is proclaimed, “By the consecration the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ is brought about. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a true, real, and substantial manner: his Body and his Blood, with his soul and his divinity.”

Pope John Paul II wrote in Ecclesia in America: “My Predecessor Paul VI deemed it necessary to explain the uniqueness of Christ’s real presence in the Eucharist, which ‘is called real not to exclude the idea that the others are real too, but rather to indicate presence par excellence, because it is sub­stantial.’ … Under the species of bread and wine, ‘Christ is present, whole and entire in his physical reality, corporally present.”

Father John Hardon, the highly regarded 20th century theologian and philosopher, described the Catholic belief in actual presence of the body and blood of Jesus in the Eucharist in the following manner.

“During the supper with His apostles on Holy Thursday, after blessing the bread and wine, Jesus once again commanded the apostles to eat His flesh and drink His blood in remembrance of Him. The celebration of the Eucharist has been part of the Catholic worship since the beginnings of the church. The Church has been consistent through the centuries that after the consecration of the bread and wine by a priest, the Eucharist contains the actual body and blood of Jesus. We are to believe that the Eucharist is Jesus Christ – simply, without qualification. It is God become man in the fullness of His divine nature, in the fullness of His human nature, in the fullness of His body and soul, in the fullness of everything that makes Jesus Jesus. He is in the Eucharist with His human mind and will united with the Divinity, with His hands and feet, His face and features, with His eyes and lips and ears and nostrils, with His affections and emotions and, with emphasis, with His living, pulsating, physical Sacred Heart. That is what our Catholic Faith demands of us that we believe. If we believe this, we are Catholic. If we do not, we are not, no matter what people may think we are.”

Assuming a person is Catholic and that Jesus is God, then it seems reasonable….no, more than reasonable….that a person should thirst after the Eucharist. What a great gift? Should not mankind flock to it?

Additional Reading Suggestions

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0941.htm   Fr. John Hardon article

http://www.catholic.com/tracts/who-can-receive-commmunion  

www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a3.htm  The Catholic Catechism